Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Adriance

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 31, 1932PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Neither the diligence of counsel nor the independent research of the court has disclosed a precedent either of English or American courts which in any direct manner bears upon the main issue in this case. The controversy, in brief, concerns the propriety of a surcharge against testamentary trustees by reason of their investment in securities which, at the time of purchase, were not authorized by law, but which subsequently, during a continuance of their retention, became legal investments.

The pertinent facts upon which a decision must be based are not in dispute and are, indeed, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laidlaw v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Comstock v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Boronkay v. Robinson & CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Koch v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. President and Directors of Manhattan Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. In re the Estate of JanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Stark v. United States Trust Co. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Saeger EstatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API