In re the Estate of Adriance
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Neither the diligence of counsel nor the independent research of the court has disclosed a precedent either of English or American courts which in any direct manner bears upon the main issue in this case. The controversy, in brief, concerns the propriety of a surcharge against testamentary trustees by reason of their investment in securities which, at the time of purchase, were not authorized by law, but which subsequently, during a continuance of their retention, became legal investments.
The pertinent facts upon which a decision must be based are not in dispute and are, indeed, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Laidlaw v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Comstock v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Boronkay v. Robinson & CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Koch v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- President and Directors of Manhattan Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- In re the Estate of JanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Stark v. United States Trust Co. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Saeger EstatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.