Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wanner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 8, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It would be difficult to imagine a more sorry and unconvincing showing than that of the present accountant in his efforts to justify his acts m the administration of this estate. No vouchers or records have been produced to substantiate his alleged expenditures and there is only his own unsupported and evasive testimony to indicate that he has not personally pocketed all the assets of the decedent which came into his hands. It is more than possible that the objecting parties would have laid greater stress on this condition were it not for the testimony finally elicited from him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Riggs v. . American Tract SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  4. In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of ValverdeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of BroganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of BeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API