Legal Opinion
State v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 4, 2012No. 66745-9-IPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
278 P.3d 203 (2012)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Cleo Palmer REED a.k.a. Cleo Reed Palmer, Appellant.
No. 66745-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 4, 2012.
Thomas Kummerow, Oliver Davis, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Andrea Vitalich, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
DWYER, J.
¶ 1 Statements to law enforcement officers do not implicate the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause where those statements are made under circumstances that, objectively viewed, indicate that the primary purpose of the encounter was to enable the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Wallace RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Bryan Eugene StreepyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington, V. Christopher Lee DerriCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Brandon GorhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Darold StensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.