Legal Opinion

Benitez v. Dunevant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 25, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0126Published

1Opinion of the Court

979 P.2d 1017 (1998)

194 Ariz. 224

Daniel Paul BENITEZ, Petitioner,

v.

The Honorable Thomas DUNEVANT III, Judge of the Superior Court Of The State Of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge,

The Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office, Real Party in Interest.

No. 1 CA-SA 98-0126.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

October 27, 1998.

Review Granted May 25, 1999.

Neal W. Bassett, Phoenix, for Petitioner.

Roderick G. McDougall, City Attorney by Rebecca M. Gore, Assistant City Prosecutor, Phoenix, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

¶ 1 We hold that driving on a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API