Legal Opinion
Benitez v. Dunevant
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 25, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0126PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
¶ 1 We hold that driving on a DUI-suspended license is a jury-eligible offense and that Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 22-320(A) (1990) is constitutional.
¶2 Petitioner was charged with driving when his license was suspended for conviction of Driving while Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor (“DUI”). The offense is in violation of A.R.S. section 28-3473(B) (1998) (formerly section 28-473(B) (Supp.1997)). Petitioner was also charged with other, more minor, violations that are not relevant here.
¶3 After a bench trial, Petitioner was found guilty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Myers v. ReebCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000