Legal Opinion

Coral Gables, Inc. v. MacBroom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1933No. Appeal, 55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit. The statement of claim alleges plaintiff is the holder of defendant’s promissory note endorsed in blank by the payee before maturity. The affidavit of- defense admits the execution of the note but denies the obligation was acquired by plaintiff before maturity and sets up a failure of consideration.

It is not alleged that plaintiff purchased the note from a holder in due course and there are no endorsements on the instrument subsequent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Pyles v. BoslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koehring Company v. VentrescaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Farrell v. North Scranton Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. McRoberts v. OpfermannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Tanner v. Van Gelder Yarn Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API