Legal Opinion

Pyles v. Bosler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1932No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an action of assumpsit brought to recover an amount alleged to be due the estate of plaintiff’s decedent from the estate of Frank C. Bosler, deceased, Hannah Elizabeth Bosler, executrix of the latter estate and the present owner of real estate formerly belonging to her decedent, being joined as individual defendant.

The record shows that both parties experienced difficulty in presenting their claims and answers with conciseness, brevity and accuracy, and that the court below displayed great patience with their failure to do so, refusing, since both were at fault, to allow…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colonial SEC. Co. v. Levy (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peabody v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Pyles, Exrx. v. Bosler, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Coral Gables, Inc. v. MacBroomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Arch v. Slovene National Benefit SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Kramer v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API