Legal Opinion

Farrell v. North Scranton Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1934No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On rule taken by the original defendant in this ease, the court below refused to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense against the additional defendant and in favor of the original defendant.

The proceeding was brought to recover from the North Scranton Bank & Trust Co., drawee (appellant here), on sixty-five checks, aggregating $61,148, drawn by plaintiff over a period of more than five years to the order of the use-plaintiff or its predecessor, on which the indorsement of the payee’s name is alleged to have been forged. The original defendant by sei fa.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brannen v. G.-S. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Coral Gables, Inc. v. MacBroomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Harrisburg Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Hart v. StevensDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API