Legal Opinion

Hane v. Hallock Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1977No. 47026PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

James Hane purchased a farm from Paul Fish in December 1969 under a contract for deed. Pursuant to the contract, Hane procured fire insurance on the house and buildings, in addition to insurance covering his personal property. On April 17, 1972, due to financial reverses and a pending cancellation of the contract for deed for nonpayment, Hane assigned his vendee’s interest in the contract to Walter Braget in exchange for Braget’s making a payment to Fish under the contract. At the same time, an informal understanding was apparently reached allowing Hane to participate in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis v. MaherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alamo Community College District v. Browning Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Teague-Strebeck Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API