Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1986No. C1-86-828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company appeals a trial court decision that both respondent William Anderson and his former spouse had insurable interests in a garage owned by the former spouse, and that both were entitled to recover payments under their respective policies when the property was destroyed by fire. State Farm contends it is not liable to Anderson for the property loss because the two policies were concurrent and because Anderson did not have an insurable interest in the property at the time of the fire. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondent William Anderson and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Frank v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Ben-Hur Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of New JerseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. National Fire Insurance v. Finerty Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Technical Land, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Creekwood Rental Town-Homes, LLC v. Kiln Underwriting Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. Crowell v. Delafield Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API