Legal Opinion
Marriage of King v. King
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1985No. CX-84-2122PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment and decree of dissolution. Appellant Ernest King claims an abuse of discretion in the award of temporary spousal maintenance and the division of the marital property. Respondent challenges the trial court’s treatment of appellant’s retirement benefits, and the lack of any provision for health insurance. We affirm.
FACTS
Ernest and Thayis King were married on April 7,1963, the second marriage for each. Both had children from their previous marriages. There are no children of this marriage.
The homestead property was owned by Ernest at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Donald S. Gustafson v. The Cornelius Company and the United Steelworkers of America and United Steelworkers of America Local Union No. 15199Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Ruzic v. RuzicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Marriage of Kottke v. KottkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriage of Nash v. NashCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Lenart v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smisek v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC's Application for a Second DrivewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023