Legal Opinion
Marriage of Nash v. Nash
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 1986No. C3-85-1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal is from a final judgment dissolving a 32-year marriage. Darlene Nash alleges error in valuation and division of marital assets. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Darlene Nash was 52 years old and William Leroy Nash was 53 years old at the time of trial. Their four children are now adults.
Darlene was a traditional homemaker during the marriage. She has a high school degree and first began working full-time just before the parties separated. She now works as a secretary for Deluxe Check Printers and nets $955 per month. She receives health insurance, purchases life…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ramette v. Digital River, Inc. (In Re Graphics Technology, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Marriage of Petschel v. PetschelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- LaValle v. LaValleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Danielson v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- James E. Ramette v. Digital River, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004