Mobile Improvement & Building Co. v. Stein
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Samuel B. Brown. The Mobile Improvement & Building Company sued Louis Stein in six actions of forcible entry and detainer. From a judgment for defendant in each, action, this single appeal is prosecuted. . Counsel discuss questions raised by the assignments of error with citation of authority, but do not discuss the question decided.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Samuel B. Brown. The Mobile Improvement & Building Company sued Louis Stein in six actions of forcible entry and detainer. From a judgment for defendant in each, action, this single appeal is prosecuted. . Counsel discuss questions raised by the assignments of error with citation of authority, but do not discuss the question decided. Counsel insist that the court cannot entertain such an appeal as is presented by this record. — Shranton, et al. v. Ballard, 64 Ala. 402; Chapman v. Taylor, 55 N. E. 1003. Counsel discuss the assignments of…
1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.
The plaintiff (appellant) brought six several actions of forcible entry and detainer against the same defendant to recover as many distinct parcels of land. In accordance with sections 2147-2149 of the Code of 1896, on the application of the defendant all of said causes were removed into the circuit court. In that court they were numbered 11,488, 11,489, 11,490, 11,491, 11,492, and 11,493, respectively. Verdict and judgment were rendered in each of said causes for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed, and presents all of said judgments for review in a single transcript.
The point is here…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cauley v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Roach v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Scranton, Barney & Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- De Sylva v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1833
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Harper v. StumpffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Decatur Land Co. v. City of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Clark v. Queen InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. MoltznerOregon Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.