Crow v. Burnett

OPINION

DAVIS, Chief Justice.

Appellant Randall Crow filed suit against Appellee Greg William Burnett for damages allegedly sustained by Crow as a result of a *895collision between their cars.1 Based on the questions submitted in the court’s charge, the jury found that:

• Burnett’s negligence proximately caused the collision;

• one hundred percent of the negligence which caused the collision is attributable to Burnett;

• Crow sustained no damages as a result of the collision; and

• Burnett was not grossly negligent.

In accordance with the verdict, the court rendered judgment that Crow take nothing from…