Legal Opinion

Shinn v. Stemler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1945No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Defendant, maker of a judgment note under seal, has appealed from the order of the court below discharging rule to show cause why the judgment entered by confession should not be opened.

Appellant’s petition to open the judgment avers merely that appellant “never received any consideration by reason of the execution ... of said judgment note.” Plaintiff’s answer was that appellant’s averment is in contradiction to and at variance with the terms and import of the judgment note, and does not present a valid defense.

Plaintiff’s position is that since the note is under seal,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Piper v. QueeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Bauer v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Killeen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Miners State Bank v. AuksztokalnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. LenchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Stankovich v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Poelcher v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Palatucci v. WoodlandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Bittner v. McGrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API