Stankovich v. Lehman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The trial judge refused to strike out a judgment by confession entered against the appellants upon a warrant of attorney contained in a promissory note which they had signed as makers. They asserted below and assert here that the appellees, the endorsees of the note, who obtained the judgment were (because the note was not negotiable and the appellees were not holders in due course) no more than assignees, subject to all defenses they, the makers, could have asserted against the original payees and that the court below abused its discretion in not striking the judgment and permitting their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Johnson v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Miners State Bank v. AuksztokalnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Remsburg v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Crothers v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cheff v. MathesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964
- Billingsley v. Lincoln National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Westring v. Cheyenne National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- JB CORPORATION v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.