Legal Opinion

Miners State Bank v. Auksztokalnis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1925No. Appeal, 87PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschziskeb,

This suit was brought by the Miners State Bank to recover from the estate of Michael Rosenberg, deceased, the balance due on a judgment note for $5,000, made by one Archbishop Alexander Nemolosky, dated January 5,1920, payable “on demand after date,” to the order of plaintiff, containing on its reverse side a writing (hereinafter called “the endorsement”) in the form of an assignment of the instrument to the Miners State Bank, a “guarantee”'of payment and a warrant to confess judgment, signed by the above-named decedent and others, the endorsers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Homewood Peoples Bank v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Volk v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Boustead v. CuylerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Campbell v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  5. Woods v. ShermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith v. LenchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Stankovich v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Shinn v. StemlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. CBS, INC. v. Film Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Bishoff v. FehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API