Legal Opinion

Mindala v. American Motors Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1985No. Appeal, No. 66 Miscellaneous Docket No. 4PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

West Cooalico Township (Township) appeals here from the dismissal of its motion for summary judgment by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster *368County. The common pleas court certified that the matter is one which “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the matter. ...” Section 702(b) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 42 Pa. O. S. 4702(b). This Court, accordingly, has granted the Township leave to appeal.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. GiblinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Calvanese v. LEISTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Powell v. Wrightstown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Haas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Mindala v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Oswald v. HausmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Majestic v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Wright v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API