Mindala v. American Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
STOUT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. HUTCHINSON, Former J., did not participate in the decision of this case. ZAPPALA, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, J., joined. LARSEN, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which McDERMOTT and PAPADAKOS, JJ., joined.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted Appellants’ petition for allowance of appeal to determine whether the Commonwealth Court erred in…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Riss v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Bergen v. KOPPENALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- MELENDEZ BY MELENDEZ v. City of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bendas v. Township of White DeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Coffman v. Wilson Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Huber v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.