Legal Opinion

Majestic v. Com., Dept. of Transp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1991No. 795 C.D. 1990, 882 C.D. 1990, 895 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

The Department of Transportation (Department), Upper St. Clair School District (School District) and Susan Majestic and her parents (collectively, the Majesties) appeal from orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. 1 The Department appeals by permission from an interlocutory order overruling its preliminary objections to the complaint filed by the Majesties; the School District also appeals by permission from an interlocutory order denying its preliminary objections to the complaint filed by the Majesties; and the Majesties appeal from an order which sustained the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Mt. Lebanon v. County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Mindala v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. LeGare v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pansy v. PreateDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Collins v. BopsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Caparo Real Estate Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Voren v. Bell Telephone Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Sloneker v. MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API