Atkinson v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
For the purposes of appeal the cases of Atkinson v. Carolina Power & Light Company and Redfearn v. Carolina Power & Light Company were consolidated.
The Redfearn case challenges the right of the defendant to condemn the fee of that portion of the land sought between the high water line and the 230 foot contour line while the Atkinson case questions defendant’s right to condemn the fee in any of the property sought.
Plaintiff contends in each case, first, that condemnation up to the 230 foot contour line is arbitrary, capricious and unnecessary, second, that Section 24-12 of the Code of Laws of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. Northwestern Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- City of Abbeville v. Aiken Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Kunkle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Seadade Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.