Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Grand Haven Charter Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1998No. Docket 202063PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). We reverse and remand.

On September 12, 1995, plaintiff was riding his bicycle on a paved bicycle path that runs parallel and adjacent to Lakeshore Drive in defendant Grand Haven Charter Township when the front tire of his bike struck a hole in the path, causing him to fall to the pavement. Plaintiff’s injuries included a fractured arm and hip.

Photographic exhibits in the record show a snow-covered path running through wooded lots and parallel to Lakeshore Drive.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Roy v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. USAA Insurance v. Houston General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Gregg v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Grand Haven TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hatch v. Grand Haven TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hatch v. Grand Haven TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API