Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hatch v. Grand Haven Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2000No. Docket 113286Published

1DissentKelly, J.

I depart from the majority’s analysis and bold conclusion that “a bicycle path is simply not a sidewalk.” Ante at 465. Instead, I believe that the Court of Appeals arrived at a reasonable conclusion and properly applied the definition of “sidewalk” used in Stabley v Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park Authority, 228 Mich App 363; 579 NW2d 374 (1998). Accordingly, I adopt the following portion of the Court of Appeals opinion:

The highway exception is a narrowly drawn exception to the broad grant of immunity for governmental units. Scheurman v Dep’t of Transportation, 434 Mich 619, 630; 456 NW2d 66…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Roy v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. USAA Insurance v. Houston General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Gregg v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API