Morrell v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. J. C. Phillips, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
The appellant, as plaintiff, sued for damages for personal injuries received while in the employ of the defendant city as a driver of one of its street-sprinkling carts.
The negligence charged in the complaint is that the defendant city knowingly furnished plaintiff a fractious, unruly and unmanageable team of horses] and that by reason thereof, on June 15, 1913, the team ran away, dragging him for a' considerable distance along the street, until he was thrown upon the ground and the sprinkling-cart passed over his body, inflicting permanent and serious injuries. The defendant interposed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattson v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- O'Harra v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1869
- Rankin v. BuckmanOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- City of Lincoln v. O'BrienNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Beatrice v. ReidNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Sumid v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Schultz v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Industrial Commission v. Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.