Legal Opinion

Theisen v. Theisen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 2009No. 26630PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

This is a family dispute concerning the will of George Theisen, who died on November 16, 2004. Appellant, Lisbeth Theisen, filed an action in February 2006 challenging the validity of the will. The trial court granted summary judgment to Respondents, holding the action was barred by the eight month statute of limitations set forth in S.C.Code Ann. § 62-3-108(3). We affirm.

FACTS

Lisbeth Theisen and Clifford Theisen (Appellants) are children of the decedent, George Theisen. Theisen was also survived by 3 other children, Claude, Susan and Eva Marie, as well as his wife Joan, who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Broome v. TruluckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Jackson v. Cannon Ex Rel. Estate of WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API