Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1994No. 24028PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether a farm tractor is a “motor vehicle” within the meaning of Title 38 of the South Carolina motor vehicle insurance laws. Appellant Barbara Anderson appeals the Master-in-Equity’s ruling that a farm tractor is not covered by the automobile insurance statutes. We affirm.

On June 19, 1988, a vehicle owned by Mack Anderson and driven by appellant (a permissive user) collided with a farm tractor driven along the highway by Berly McDowell. Appellant was injured and McDowell died of the injuries sustained in the accident.

At the time of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Baptist Church of Mauldin v. City of MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. VanoverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  3. White v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Estate of Guide v. SpoonerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Clayton v. GRANGE INSURANCE ASS'N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Theisen v. TheisenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API