State v. Latimore
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On appeal, Reginald Latimore (Latimore) claims the circuit court committed reversible error at his trial for failing to register as a sex offender when the circuit court (1) failed to grant a mistrial after it instructed the jury that Latimore was convicted of committing a lewd act on a child, despite a pretrial stipulation not to disclose Latimore’s specific conviction to the jury; (2) failed to grant a directed verdict, despite the State’s failure to prove Latimore received notice of a new reporting requirement for sex offender registration; and (3) excluded a probation agent’s testimony.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LatimoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012