Legal Opinion

State v. Latimore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 24, 2010No. 4728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On appeal, Reginald Latimore (Latimore) claims the circuit court committed reversible error at his trial for failing to register as a sex offender when the circuit court (1) failed to grant a mistrial after it instructed the jury that Latimore was convicted of committing a lewd act on a child, despite a pretrial stipulation not to disclose Latimore’s specific conviction to the jury; (2) failed to grant a directed verdict, despite the State’s failure to prove Latimore received notice of a new reporting requirement for sex offender registration; and (3) excluded a probation agent’s testimony.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LatimoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API