Legal Opinion

Rabon v. Mali

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 27, 1986No. 22556PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

The Appellants-Respondents, lot owners in the Lakeside subdivision, brought this action against the Respondents-Appellants, the owners of four lots designated as 48, 49, 50 and 51 in the subdivision, to restrain and enjoin the Respondents-Appellants from operating any type of commercial enterprises on restricted Lots 50 and 51, and to remove the paved parking spaces thereon. The trial court restrained and enjoined the Respondents-Appellants from using any portion of Lots 50 and 51 for commercial purposes, but did not require the removal of the paved parking spaces. We affirm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Archambault v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Arceneaux v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Circle Square Co. v. Atlantis Development Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Elrod v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Elrod v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Chambers of South Carolina, Inc. v. County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Buffington v. T.O.E. EnterprisesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Jefferson Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. GumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API