Rabon v. Mali
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Justice:
The Appellants-Respondents, lot owners in the Lakeside subdivision, brought this action against the Respondents-Appellants, the owners of four lots designated as 48, 49, 50 and 51 in the subdivision, to restrain and enjoin the Respondents-Appellants from operating any type of commercial enterprises on restricted Lots 50 and 51, and to remove the paved parking spaces thereon. The trial court restrained and enjoined the Respondents-Appellants from using any portion of Lots 50 and 51 for commercial purposes, but did not require the removal of the paved parking spaces. We affirm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Archambault v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Arceneaux v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Circle Square Co. v. Atlantis Development Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Elrod v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Elrod v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Chambers of South Carolina, Inc. v. County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Buffington v. T.O.E. EnterprisesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Jefferson Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. GumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.