Legal Opinion

Elrod v. . Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for specific performance of a contract of lease. The plaintiff is the owner of Lot 9 and a part of Lot 10 in the Crescent Heights Subdivision, a real estate development made by Elizabeth Realty Company in 1909, the locus in quo being situated on the northwest corner of Providence Road and Cherokee Road (formerly Vail Avenue). The plaintiff and defendant have entered into a contract wherein the plaintiff agrees to lease the locus in quo to the defendant for a term of five years for the purpose of constructing and operating a filling station thereon, and the defendant agrees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Johnston v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. McLeskey v. . HeinleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sheets v. . DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Sheets v. DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Brenizer v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API