Elrod v. Phillips
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
All of the findings of fact by the court are amply sustained by the evidence.
The question presented for our consideration is whether the findings of fact sustain the court’s conclusions of law. We have two lines of decisions in this jurisdiction involving the circumstances under which restrictive covenants in deeds for property originally devoted to residential purposes are rendered unenforceable or are enforced. The leading eases where such restrictions were held unenforceable are Starkey v. Gardner, 194 N. C., 74, and Snyder v. Caldwell, 207 N. C., 626, and the leading cases wherein such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Johnston v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- McLeskey v. . HeinleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sheets v. . DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Sheets v. DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Brenizer v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Logan v. SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.