Carhart v. Stenberg
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
Having prevailed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 effort to stop enforcement of Nebraska’s partial-birth abortion law, Dr. Carhart now requests (filing 47) that he be compensated for the attorney fees and expenses that he has incurred as a result of this litigation. See 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) (Cum.Supp.1998). I will grant his motion in part and award fees and expenses of $46,855.29.
I. Background
The plaintiff, a doctor who performs late-term abortions on nonviable fetuses, sued the defendants in an effort to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Julius C. Henry, Cross-Appellees v. Glenn D. Webermeier and Garden Village, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mark IafeliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- John Perotti v. Richard P. Seiter, Gary F. Brown, Sgt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Mary Craik v. The Minnesota State University BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Howard Hatfield, Et Ux. v. James R. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A Choice for Women v. ButterworthDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- U & I SANITATION v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2000
- ACLU Nebraska Found. v. CITY OF PLATTSMOUTH, NE.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2002
- South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2000
- UCP International Company Limited v. Balsam Brands Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019