Legal Opinion
South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. South Dakota
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 15, 2000No. CIV. 99-3018Published
1Opinion of the Court
*675ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
[111.] On November 3, 1998, the people of South Dakota, through the initiative process, amended Article XVII of the South Dakota Constitution by adding Sections 21 through 24. Known as Amendment E (because of its placement on the general election ballot), Sections 21 through 24 prohibit certain forms of business enterprises (those which limit liability) from conducting certain agricultural operations in South Dakota.
[112.] South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. (“Farm Bureau”) and other plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.