Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Iafelice
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 19, 1992No. 91-6060PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Mark Iafelice of possessing heroin with the intent to distribute. Iafelice moved for a post-verdict judgment of acquittal, which the district court granted, concluding that the evidence was insufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Iafelice committed the crime. The government appeals from this order. The principal issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Iafelice. We hold that a reasonable jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Iafelice possessed heroin with the intent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.