Legal Opinion
Barr v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs, present and former Judges serving in Monroe County, challenge the disparity between their salaries and salaries paid to County Court Judges in Albany County pursuant to Judiciary Law § 221-d. Plaintiffs contend that the distinction in financial treatment between them and Albany County Court Judges under that statute violates their right to equal protection of the laws under the Federal and State Constitutions (US Const, 14th Amend, § 1;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weissman v. BellacosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Clam Lake Development, Inc. v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- D'Amico v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carpenter v. Saltone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Barr v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Barr ex rel. All Present & Future Judges v. CrossonNew York Supreme Court · 1998