Legal Opinion

Weissman v. Bellacosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1987PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kooper, J.

The question to be resolved on appeal is whether statutorily prescribed disparities in the salaries of certain County Court Judges serving in adjoining localities comport with both Federal and State constitutional mandates guaranteeing citizens equal protection of the laws (US Const 14th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 11). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the disparate financial treatment perpetuated by the legislation challenged at bar deprives the plaintiffs of their rights to equal protection and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of Special Term.

Pur…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Rahmey v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Briscoe v. Prince George's County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Deutsch v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Margolis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. New York City Managerial Employees Ass'n v. DinkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API