Legal Opinion
Harper v. Providence Washington Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:
¶ 1 Appellant Providence Washington Insurance Company (Providence) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying its petition to vacate an arbitration award. We affirm.
¶ 2 Herman Harper, appellee, was injured in a car accident in Collingswood, New Jersey, during the course of his employment. Harper’s employer, Advanced Delivery Services, provided Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) insurance coverage for Harper through Providence; the policy provided that this coverage was in excess of whatever other insurance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Boyle v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Sorber v. American Motorists InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Gardner v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Chambers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nationwide Insurance v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & MunicipalitiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Krakower v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brian D. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.