Legal Opinion

Sorber v. American Motorists Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge.

American Motorists Insurance Company appeals from the August 10,1995 order1 entered by the trial court in this action *509which was filed by appellant’s insureds, Bradley R. and Phyllis Sorber. We affirm.

The record reveals the following. Appellant’s insureds, Bradley R. and Phyllis Sorber (appellees), were involved in an automobile accident on August 1, 1992, with Daniel Agresta, the tortfeasor. Anthem Insurance Company insured Daniel Agresta. On behalf of Agresta, Anthem tendered a partial settlement of $40,000 of the tortfeasor’s face amount of $50,-000 liability, or eighty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Palladino v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Chambers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In the Interest of S.T.S., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Haun v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Marks v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Nationwide Insurance v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API