Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Nelson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 5, 1988No. 5412PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.

This is an action seeking payment for legal services rendered to the defendant. The defendant filed a counterclaim alleging malpractice by the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered after verdicts for the plaintiff on his complaint and on the defendant’s counterclaim. The defendant appealed to this court. We find no error.

The defendant retained the services of the plaintiff, a member of the Connecticut bar, on July 13,1984, to obtain a dissolution of his marriage and a property settlement. The plaintiff instituted an action for dissolution and, on December 17, 1984, dissolution was obtained. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Presidential Capital Corp. v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Febbroriello v. FebbrorielloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Paul v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Somma v. GraceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API