Legal Opinion

Mountain Lake Colony v. McJunkin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 1992No. 23644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Appellant Mountain Lake Colony (Mountain Lake) contends that the trial judge erred in refusing to refer this action to the master-in-equity. We dismiss.

I. FACTS

Both Mountain Lake and respondent James M. McJunkin (McJunkin) claim ownership to a tract of land in Greenville County. Mountain Lake brought an action for damages resulting from McJunkin’s conversion of timber and trespass on the land; injunctive relief enjoining McJunkin from entering the land; and for a declaratory judgment declaring that Mountain Lake is the true and lawful owner of the disputed tract. In his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Every v. Chinquapin Hollow, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Williford v. DownsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santoro v. SCHULTHESSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Dargan v. TankersleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Hilton Head Plantation Property Owners' Ass'n v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Dargan v. TankersleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. HILTON HEAD PROP. OWNERS'ASS'N v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API