Van Every v. Chinquapin Hollow, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
This appeal followed a denial of appellant’s motion for a compulsory order of reference in a boundary dispute between appellant and respondent. Appellant prayed for the court to remove the cloud on his title caused by respondent’s claims by finding that the Keith survey dated September 10, 1974 accurately fixed their common boundary line. Following the complaint, appellant moved before the court for an order of reference on the grounds that (1) boundary lines are basically an equity matter (2) a great number of technical matters involved would be too involved for jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Windham v. HowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Bryan v. FreemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Capell v. MosesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- State, by Peeples, Atty. Gen. v. GibbesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Frazee v. BeattieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garrett v. LockeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Good v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Freeman v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Clark v. HargraveCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Fox v. MoultrieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.