Legal Opinion
Dargan v. Tankersley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 22, 2008No. 26574PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BEATTY:
In this quiet title action, E. Ervin Dargan, Jr. and New River Corporation (Appellants) appeal from an order finding James B. Tankersley and the remaining parties (collectively, Respondents) were the owners of a disputed parcel of property and awarding them damages. We reverse.
I. FACTS
Appellants brought this quiet title action to establish their ownership of a tract of real property in Greenville County, South Carolina. Respondents claimed an interest in the property and asserted counterclaims for damages. The disputed parcel is mountainous property measuring approximately…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wilson v. BoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Fuller-Ahrens Partnership v. S.C. Deparment of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Tenney v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Lollis v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Dargan v. TankersleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Major v. PENN COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Major v. PENN COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011