Legal Opinion

Franklin Co. v. Buhl Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1933No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 37,268PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant, by writ, attached restaurant fixtures and furnishings of plaintiff company, its tenant, receipted to the sheriff, and converted the same to its own use. The attachment was dissolved, and plaintiff company brought this suit, now prosecuted by its receiver, to recover damages for malicious attachment and conversion, and had verdict. Previously the defendant had recovered a judgment for rent against plaintiff company, and in the suit at bar gave notice of set-off. After verdict, and before judgment, defendant moved the court to set off its judgment against the damages found in favor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Lincoln Housing TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Smith v. MosierMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Robinson v. KunklemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Wells v. Circuit Judge for St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean KosmalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Klingensmith v. James B. Clow & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mahesh v. MillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Hoekzema v. Van HaftenMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Castro v. GoemaereMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API