Hoekzema v. Van Haften

This is an appeal by plaintiffs George Hoekzema and wife from a judgment en tered in favor of defendants Edward Van Haften and Ms brother, Ray Van Haften, in a new trial ordered in Hoekzema v. Van Haften, 313 Mich. 417.

The facts reported in that opinion need not be repeated here. At the second trial, because of the opinion rendered by this Court and certain stipulated facts, the gross unpaid amount due defendants on the purchase of a dairy herd, farm, and equipment was $10,093.59. From this the jury deducted $2,876.85, which was determined by it to be the amount plaintiffs were damaged…