Legal Opinion

Gray v. Lincoln Housing Trust

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). There can be no doubt upon this record of the authority of the Agency to bind the Trust. By the terms of their agreement practically the entire management of the Trust was turned over to the Agency. It received the first four monthly payments of $7.50 each made on each $1,000 of certificates issued and 50 cents on all other monthly payments and in turn was to pay the entire expenses of the Trust; it was empowered to appoint all sales agents, sales managers and agents for the Trust and countersign all certificates. The agreement between the Trust and the Agency…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. American Trust & Savings Bank v. McGettiganIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Funk v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Nix v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean KosmalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Klingensmith v. James B. Clow & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stram v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Franklin Co. v. Buhl Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rowe v. William Ford & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API