Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Wells v. Circuit Judge for St. Joseph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus.

1Per curiam

Motion is made for a mandamus to compel the judge below to allow a set-off of one judgment against another, which he refused on account of a dispute as to rights of an attorney and assignee.

It is very well worth considering whether the statute regulating set-off of executions may not have in some respects interfered with the power to set-off judgments on motion. But it is not necessary to determine this because the case before us does not require it.

It is well settled that the power of courts to set off judgments on motion and not in q regular judicial proceeding is subject to a much broader…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simson v. HartCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  2. Nicoll v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  3. Hall v. EmmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Purchase v. BellowsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lyle v. Cass Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Franklin Co. v. Buhl Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lyon v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API