Legal Opinion
Coleman v. City of Richmond
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 17, 1988No. Record No. 0646-86-2PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
COLEMAN, J.
— This panel held in Coleman v. City of Richmond, 5 Va. App. 459, 364 S.E.2d 239 (1988), that § 20-83 of the Ordinances of the City of Richmond which prohibits loitering in a public place “under circumstances manifesting the purpose of engaging in prostitution” was unconstitutional due to over-breadth and vagueness. The City of Richmond petitions the panel for a rehearing pursuant to Rule 5A:33. The city attorney for Richmond, who did not participate in the appeal, requests leave to appear on behalf of the city and joins in the petition for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mandel v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- John E. Cato and Mrs. Lucille B. Cato v. Morgan Collins, President of Forrest City Special School District No. 7, Cecil TwillieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Coleman v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Jackson v. W.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Bell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.