United States v. Phillips
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant Robert Tucker (“Tucker”) cross-moves for partial summary judgment as to his first counterclaim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
The Parties
Robert Tucker is an attorney admitted to the New York Bar and a partner in the law firm of Baker & McKenzie. He was business manager and attorney to defendant Phillips.
Defendant John E.A. Phillips (“Phillips”) is a songwriter. He…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hegeman v. . MoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. SweenyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Cipriano v. ToccoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Cipriano v. ToccoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Internal Revenue Service v. OrrDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- United States v. RegisterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.