Legal Opinion

Cipriano v. Tocco

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 26, 1991No. 2:89-cv-73517PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS

ROSEN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the following Motions: 1) the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the United States, Only; 2) the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 3) the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants Peter Tocco and Anne Tocco and Defendant Frank Ioli, Only; and 4) the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant Frank Ioli’s Cross-Claim. These motions were brought before the Court for hearing on Tuesday, February 19, 1991, at which time the Court heard the arguments of counsel…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kosak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. NeeseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. In Re DUKE ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Cipriano v. ToccoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  4. Cardinal v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. In re BabichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API