Legal Opinion
Wayne S. Marteney v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1957No. 5528_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is here on stipulated facts and presents a question of the priority of a statutory lien of the United States for unpaid taxes over a claim of attorneys to the proceeds of a judgment in favor of the delinquent taxpayer whom the attorneys represented. The trial court held that the United States had a prior lien.
Beginning in 1952, Wayne S. Marteney had been represented in a series of civil and criminal cases by Jochems Sargent & Blaes, a Wichita, Kansas law firm. For these services Marteney had given the law firm his note, upon which it was agreed that as of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Central Bank of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Davis & Warshow, Inc. v. S. Iser, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Kuffel v. United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Wilsey-Bennett Trucking Company, a Corporation v. A. W. Frost and M. K. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.