Legal Opinion
Stump v. Gates
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 31, 1991No. 91-C-0509PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sara Stump and Andrew Ocrant commenced this action asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for denial of the right of access to the courts (first claim), conspiracy (second claim) and defamation (third claim). Plaintiffs further assert pendent state law claims for civil conspiracy (fourth claim), gross negligence (fifth claim), defamation (sixth claim) and outrageous conduct (seventh claim). All claims arise out of acts allegedly committed in Colorado.
Defendants are: (1) Sueann Ocrant; (2) the Arapahoe County (Colorado) Coroner’s…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Vance v. County of Santa ClaraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Young v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Williams v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.